Correction et script de compilation
This commit is contained in:
parent
21f11a1fbc
commit
a4e75f0179
9 changed files with 453 additions and 435 deletions
BIN
7_8_Economics_Gini_coefficient2.png
Normal file
BIN
7_8_Economics_Gini_coefficient2.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
After Width: | Height: | Size: 29 KiB |
BIN
9_4-channels.png
BIN
9_4-channels.png
Binary file not shown.
BIN
9_4-channels.svg
BIN
9_4-channels.svg
Binary file not shown.
BIN
Intro-To-Marketing-Coursera.pdf
Normal file
BIN
Intro-To-Marketing-Coursera.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
479
Week1.md
479
Week1.md
|
@ -1,17 +1,19 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "Introduction to marketing: Part 1"
|
||||
title: "Introduction to marketing: Part 1 - Course Notes"
|
||||
author: "François Pelletier"
|
||||
output: pdf_document
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Wharton School - Introduction to marketing
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 1: BRANDING: Marketing Strategy and Brand Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.1: Building Strong brands
|
||||
|
||||
What is marketing ?
|
||||
|
||||
- Study of market exchange between two or more partners.
|
||||
- This simpliest example is having one buyer and one seller.
|
||||
- Study of market exchange between two or more partners.
|
||||
- This simpliest example is having one buyer and one seller.
|
||||
|
||||
### Spectrum between two extremes:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -60,12 +62,12 @@ What is marketing ?
|
|||
|
||||
### Competitive advantage
|
||||
|
||||
No. | Advantage | Measure
|
||||
---|---|---
|
||||
1. | Lowest cost | Market share
|
||||
2. | Quality and service: Customer knowledge and data | Customer share and loyalty
|
||||
3. | Transformation: custoemr as co-creator of value | Buzz / Word of mouth / Referrals
|
||||
4. | Trust: discipline | Reduced cost of acquisition of a customer
|
||||
| No. | Advantage | Measure |
|
||||
|-----|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| 1. | Lowest cost | Market share |
|
||||
| 2. | Quality and service: Customer knowledge and data | Customer share and loyalty |
|
||||
| 3. | Transformation: custoemr as co-creator of value | Buzz / Word of mouth / Referrals |
|
||||
| 4. | Trust: discipline | Reduced cost of acquisition of a customer |
|
||||
|
||||
### Three principles of marketing
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -75,12 +77,12 @@ No. | Advantage | Measure
|
|||
|
||||
### 4 P's of marketing (marketing mix)
|
||||
|
||||
Name | Refers to
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Product | Seller
|
||||
Place | Distribution
|
||||
Promotion | Advertisement
|
||||
Price | Buyer
|
||||
| Name | Refers to |
|
||||
|-----------|---------------|
|
||||
| Product | Seller |
|
||||
| Place | Distribution |
|
||||
| Promotion | Advertisement |
|
||||
| Price | Buyer |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.2 Strategic marketing
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -103,13 +105,13 @@ Price | Buyer
|
|||
|
||||
### Value map
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Provide a fair value for 2 of the 3 bundles. Provide superior value for 1 on the 3 bundles.
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategies for leadership
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
1. Product attributes -> Operational excellence -> Customization
|
||||
2. What are customer expectations -> fair value
|
||||
|
@ -146,9 +148,9 @@ Personal services: High customer intimacy, low cost efficiency
|
|||
|
||||
Market segment:
|
||||
|
||||
- Dividing into subsets
|
||||
- Marketing target
|
||||
- Reach with a distinct marketing mix (4P)
|
||||
- Dividing into subsets
|
||||
- Marketing target
|
||||
- Reach with a distinct marketing mix (4P)
|
||||
|
||||
### How to divide market segments
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -214,22 +216,22 @@ What makes a segment attractive ?
|
|||
- Develop measures of segment attractiveness
|
||||
- Select based on business capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
| | *Segment attractiveness* | |
|
||||
|----------------------|-------------------------|---------|
|
||||
| *Competitive strength* | *Low* | *High* |
|
||||
| Low | Stay away | Beware |
|
||||
| High | Domination is essential | Perfect |
|
||||
| | *Segment attractiveness* | |
|
||||
|------------------------|--------------------------|---------|
|
||||
| *Competitive strength* | *Low* | *High* |
|
||||
| Low | Stay away | Beware |
|
||||
| High | Domination is essential | Perfect |
|
||||
|
||||
## 1.4 Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
A brand is a proprietary trademark:
|
||||
|
||||
- An informal contract, a relationship:
|
||||
- Promise
|
||||
- Specific benefits
|
||||
- Quality
|
||||
- Value
|
||||
- It is whatever the customer thinks it is, in a relationship mindset
|
||||
- An informal contract, a relationship:
|
||||
- Promise
|
||||
- Specific benefits
|
||||
- Quality
|
||||
- Value
|
||||
- It is whatever the customer thinks it is, in a relationship mindset
|
||||
|
||||
### Positioning:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -239,35 +241,35 @@ A brand is a proprietary trademark:
|
|||
|
||||
A positioning:
|
||||
|
||||
- Make use of all of the elements in the marketing mix
|
||||
- Focus on a few key benefits
|
||||
- Must be defendable
|
||||
- Require making choices, because you can't do everything
|
||||
- Make use of all of the elements in the marketing mix
|
||||
- Focus on a few key benefits
|
||||
- Must be defendable
|
||||
- Require making choices, because you can't do everything
|
||||
|
||||
A strategic idea:
|
||||
|
||||
- Big picture:
|
||||
- What products to sell
|
||||
- Customers and competitors
|
||||
- Tactical
|
||||
- Messaging
|
||||
- Strategic and technological
|
||||
- Big picture:
|
||||
- What products to sell
|
||||
- Customers and competitors
|
||||
- Tactical
|
||||
- Messaging
|
||||
- Strategic and technological
|
||||
|
||||
### Points of parity
|
||||
|
||||
What is shared with other brands:
|
||||
|
||||
- Category: What is a grocery store (what it must have)
|
||||
- Competitive: Negate competitors' points of difference
|
||||
- Category: What is a grocery store (what it must have)
|
||||
- Competitive: Negate competitors' points of difference
|
||||
|
||||
### Points of difference
|
||||
|
||||
Points of difference are what differentiate from other brands:
|
||||
|
||||
- Strong, favorable, unique brand associations
|
||||
- Similar to notion of USP (Unique selling proposition)
|
||||
- SCA (Sustainable competitive advantage, long-term advantage)
|
||||
- Performance attributes, benefits, imagery, design
|
||||
- Strong, favorable, unique brand associations
|
||||
- Similar to notion of USP (Unique selling proposition)
|
||||
- SCA (Sustainable competitive advantage, long-term advantage)
|
||||
- Performance attributes, benefits, imagery, design
|
||||
|
||||
### Criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -290,19 +292,19 @@ Mental map: brand associations and responses for a target market. What comes to
|
|||
|
||||
Core brand values:
|
||||
|
||||
- Set of abstract concepts and phrases
|
||||
- Select 5-10 most important for points of parity and points of difference
|
||||
- Set of abstract concepts and phrases
|
||||
- Select 5-10 most important for points of parity and points of difference
|
||||
|
||||
Brand mantra:
|
||||
|
||||
- Heart and soul
|
||||
- Brand essence: core brand promise
|
||||
- Function (nature, type of experience)
|
||||
- Descriptive modifier (clarifies nature)
|
||||
- Emotional modifier (how provide benefits)
|
||||
- Communicate
|
||||
- Simplify
|
||||
- Inspire
|
||||
- Heart and soul
|
||||
- Brand essence: core brand promise
|
||||
- Function (nature, type of experience)
|
||||
- Descriptive modifier (clarifies nature)
|
||||
- Emotional modifier (how provide benefits)
|
||||
- Communicate
|
||||
- Simplify
|
||||
- Inspire
|
||||
|
||||
Use internally to guide decisions and what should/shouldn't be associated with.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -312,58 +314,58 @@ Use internally to guide decisions and what should/shouldn't be associated with.
|
|||
|
||||
Customer experience is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Social, behavioral, emotional
|
||||
- Triggered stimulations
|
||||
- Social, behavioral, emotional
|
||||
- Triggered stimulations
|
||||
|
||||
Process / Result / Living / Undergoing / Situations
|
||||
|
||||
- Connect brand and company to customer lifestyle.
|
||||
- Put actions and purchase occasions in a broader social context
|
||||
- Connect brand and company to customer lifestyle.
|
||||
- Put actions and purchase occasions in a broader social context
|
||||
|
||||
Traditional view | Experience view
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Differentiation | Experience
|
||||
Promise | Relationship
|
||||
Attributes | Personality
|
||||
Static | Dynamic
|
||||
Mass | Individual
|
||||
Awareness | Relevance
|
||||
| Traditional view | Experience view |
|
||||
|------------------|-----------------|
|
||||
| Differentiation | Experience |
|
||||
| Promise | Relationship |
|
||||
| Attributes | Personality |
|
||||
| Static | Dynamic |
|
||||
| Mass | Individual |
|
||||
| Awareness | Relevance |
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiential brand positioning
|
||||
|
||||
Experiential brand positioning is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Multisensory
|
||||
- Different from all competitors
|
||||
- Multisensory
|
||||
- Different from all competitors
|
||||
|
||||
Brand value promise: describe what customers:
|
||||
|
||||
- Gets, sense, feel, think, act, relate to, ...
|
||||
- For all channels of distirubtion
|
||||
- Gets, sense, feel, think, act, relate to, ...
|
||||
- For all channels of distirubtion
|
||||
|
||||
### Experiential components
|
||||
|
||||
Experiential components are: (Schmitt 1999)
|
||||
|
||||
- 5 senses: Across senses
|
||||
- Emotions: Mild / Strong positive feeling
|
||||
- Cognitive: appeal to intellect / creativity / surprise
|
||||
- Behave: Experience / lifestyle / enrich / alternative
|
||||
- Social: community, belonging, culture
|
||||
- 5 senses: Across senses
|
||||
- Emotions: Mild / Strong positive feeling
|
||||
- Cognitive: appeal to intellect / creativity / surprise
|
||||
- Behave: Experience / lifestyle / enrich / alternative
|
||||
- Social: community, belonging, culture
|
||||
|
||||
### Strong vs weak brands
|
||||
|
||||
Strong | Weak
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Make clear promises kept over time | Vague promise that change
|
||||
Rich unique brand equity | Very general equity
|
||||
Strong thoughts and feelings | Low emotional commitment
|
||||
Dependable, delivers consistently | Spatly reputation, create doubt
|
||||
Loyal frachise | little loyalty, pricing based and short-term
|
||||
Superior product and processes | Promotional incentives
|
||||
Distinctive | Not distinctive
|
||||
Alignment of internal and external commitment to the brand | No internal alignment
|
||||
Stay relevant | Gets outdated
|
||||
| Strong | Weak |
|
||||
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Make clear promises kept over time | Vague promise that change |
|
||||
| Rich unique brand equity | Very general equity |
|
||||
| Strong thoughts and feelings | Low emotional commitment |
|
||||
| Dependable, delivers consistently | Spatly reputation, create doubt |
|
||||
| Loyal frachise | little loyalty, pricing based and short-term |
|
||||
| Superior product and processes | Promotional incentives |
|
||||
| Distinctive | Not distinctive |
|
||||
| Alignment of internal and external commitment to the brand | No internal alignment |
|
||||
| Stay relevant | Gets outdated |
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 2 - Customer Decision Making and the Role of Brand
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -371,24 +373,24 @@ Stay relevant | Gets outdated
|
|||
|
||||
How customers make decisions: shopping experience
|
||||
|
||||
- Impulse purchase
|
||||
- Habit, intuition, emotion
|
||||
- What they see and what they miss
|
||||
- Personal relevance
|
||||
- Impulse purchase
|
||||
- Habit, intuition, emotion
|
||||
- What they see and what they miss
|
||||
- Personal relevance
|
||||
|
||||
Multi-staged / Multi-channeled process
|
||||
|
||||
Simple stage models:
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior
|
||||
- Marketing actions:
|
||||
1. Awareness of need
|
||||
2. Identification of products
|
||||
3. Information
|
||||
4. Evaluation
|
||||
5. Purchase
|
||||
6. Use
|
||||
7. Post-purchase evaluation
|
||||
- Customer behavior
|
||||
- Marketing actions:
|
||||
1. Awareness of need
|
||||
2. Identification of products
|
||||
3. Information
|
||||
4. Evaluation
|
||||
5. Purchase
|
||||
6. Use
|
||||
7. Post-purchase evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
Strategy: Sources of information axis and time of day axis: focus on each stage at each time
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -396,18 +398,18 @@ Strategy: Sources of information axis and time of day axis: focus on each stage
|
|||
|
||||
The shooping process consists of the following steps:
|
||||
|
||||
- Recognise a need: Satisfy by buying a product
|
||||
- Natural need: food, replace a product
|
||||
- Create a need:
|
||||
1. Pay attention to product and brands
|
||||
2. Know the trigger events and when they occurs
|
||||
3. Create a new trigger event
|
||||
- Shopping goals:
|
||||
1. Seasons and holidays (triggers in store and online)
|
||||
2. Exclusive offers (emails)
|
||||
3. Oil change (reminders)
|
||||
4. Haircut (notices)
|
||||
- Create "news" for customers on website and social networks
|
||||
- Recognise a need: Satisfy by buying a product
|
||||
- Natural need: food, replace a product
|
||||
- Create a need:
|
||||
1. Pay attention to product and brands
|
||||
2. Know the trigger events and when they occurs
|
||||
3. Create a new trigger event
|
||||
- Shopping goals:
|
||||
1. Seasons and holidays (triggers in store and online)
|
||||
2. Exclusive offers (emails)
|
||||
3. Oil change (reminders)
|
||||
4. Haircut (notices)
|
||||
- Create "news" for customers on website and social networks
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.3 Information search stage
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -428,23 +430,23 @@ The next stage after identifying a need:
|
|||
|
||||
Online:
|
||||
|
||||
- Interactive display
|
||||
- Website search
|
||||
- Online flagship store
|
||||
- Interactive display
|
||||
- Website search
|
||||
- Online flagship store
|
||||
|
||||
In store:
|
||||
|
||||
- Flagship stores
|
||||
- External search (what drives attention, goal for going in store)
|
||||
- Social influences: social networks, salesperson, customer reviews
|
||||
- Flagship stores
|
||||
- External search (what drives attention, goal for going in store)
|
||||
- Social influences: social networks, salesperson, customer reviews
|
||||
|
||||
Get customer's attention:
|
||||
|
||||
- Capacity is limited
|
||||
- Information can be too much: filters, cocktail party effects
|
||||
- "get it"
|
||||
- Color blocks / packaging
|
||||
- Pack structures: different lines of quality / natural / flavours
|
||||
- Capacity is limited
|
||||
- Information can be too much: filters, cocktail party effects
|
||||
- "get it"
|
||||
- Color blocks / packaging
|
||||
- Pack structures: different lines of quality / natural / flavours
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.4 Choice overload
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -452,11 +454,11 @@ Too much information = Choose not to choose
|
|||
|
||||
Perceived variaty vs actual variety: reconciling the paradox
|
||||
|
||||
- Assortment stage: Variety is good
|
||||
- Choice stage: Variety can be complex
|
||||
- Align the attributes (one shelf for a characteristic)
|
||||
- Have an expert on-site
|
||||
- Aligh products the way the customer thinks they should be
|
||||
- Assortment stage: Variety is good
|
||||
- Choice stage: Variety can be complex
|
||||
- Align the attributes (one shelf for a characteristic)
|
||||
- Have an expert on-site
|
||||
- Aligh products the way the customer thinks they should be
|
||||
|
||||
## 2.5 Purchase stage
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -484,28 +486,29 @@ Choose to repurchase or tell others
|
|||
|
||||
Customer satisfaction:
|
||||
|
||||
- Actual performance not really evaluated
|
||||
- Perceived performance
|
||||
- Expectations are reasonable: happy or unhappy in respect to expectation
|
||||
- Actual performance not really evaluated
|
||||
- Perceived performance
|
||||
- Expectations are reasonable: happy or unhappy in respect to expectation
|
||||
|
||||
Positive | Negative
|
||||
--- | ---
|
||||
Repurchase | Switch to competitor
|
||||
Positive word of mouth | Negative word of mouth
|
||||
|| Complain to company (address complaint can result in positive)
|
||||
|| Lawsuit
|
||||
| Positive | Negative |
|
||||
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Repurchase | Switch to competitor |
|
||||
| Positive word of mouth | Negative word of mouth |
|
||||
| | Complain to company (address complaint can result in positive) |
|
||||
| | Lawsuit |
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer reviews are effective.
|
||||
|
||||
### Messages that catch on
|
||||
|
||||
--- | --- | ---
|
||||
S|ocial currency | Share what makes us look good
|
||||
T|riggers | When reminded, one share
|
||||
E|motion | Emotional messages are more powerful
|
||||
P|ublic | Public is more catching
|
||||
P|ractical value | Useful and informative
|
||||
S|tories | Like to tell good stories (background of a product)
|
||||
| STEPPS | Meaning |---|
|
||||
|---|----------------|---|
|
||||
| S | ocial currency | Share what makes us look good |
|
||||
| T | riggers | When reminded, one share |
|
||||
| E | motion | Emotional messages are more powerful |
|
||||
| P | ublic | Public is more catching |
|
||||
| P | ractical value | Useful and informative |
|
||||
| S | tories | Like to tell good stories (background of a product) |
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 3 - Effective Brand Communications Strategies and Repositioning Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -513,14 +516,14 @@ S|tories | Like to tell good stories (background of a product)
|
|||
|
||||
Perception:
|
||||
|
||||
- Developing an interpretation of a stimulus
|
||||
- Most crucial process:
|
||||
- Affect actions
|
||||
- Affect what is "true"
|
||||
- Developing an interpretation of a stimulus
|
||||
- Most crucial process:
|
||||
- Affect actions
|
||||
- Affect what is "true"
|
||||
|
||||
Is constructive
|
||||
|
||||
- Function of context
|
||||
- Function of context
|
||||
|
||||
Two major factors of bias:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -546,40 +549,40 @@ Process:
|
|||
|
||||
Choosing a brand name:
|
||||
|
||||
- Brand name, logo, symbol, character, packaging, slogan, colors
|
||||
- They all work together to provide an identity
|
||||
- What would they think about the product if they only see brand elements
|
||||
- Brand name, logo, symbol, character, packaging, slogan, colors
|
||||
- They all work together to provide an identity
|
||||
- What would they think about the product if they only see brand elements
|
||||
|
||||
Criteria:
|
||||
|
||||
- Memorable
|
||||
- Easily recognised
|
||||
- Easily recalled
|
||||
- Meaningful
|
||||
- Descriptive
|
||||
- Persuasive
|
||||
- Appealing
|
||||
- Fun and interesting aesthetically
|
||||
- Rich visual and verbal imagery
|
||||
- Protectable
|
||||
- Legally
|
||||
- Competitively
|
||||
- Adaptable
|
||||
- Flexible
|
||||
- Updateable
|
||||
- Transferable
|
||||
- Within / across categories
|
||||
- Geographical boundaries and cultures
|
||||
- Memorable
|
||||
- Easily recognised
|
||||
- Easily recalled
|
||||
- Meaningful
|
||||
- Descriptive
|
||||
- Persuasive
|
||||
- Appealing
|
||||
- Fun and interesting aesthetically
|
||||
- Rich visual and verbal imagery
|
||||
- Protectable
|
||||
- Legally
|
||||
- Competitively
|
||||
- Adaptable
|
||||
- Flexible
|
||||
- Updateable
|
||||
- Transferable
|
||||
- Within / across categories
|
||||
- Geographical boundaries and cultures
|
||||
|
||||
Strength and weaknesses, strategically balance
|
||||
|
||||
Element | Advantages | Disavantages
|
||||
---|---|---
|
||||
Names | Anchor, Quick | Difficult to change, globalization
|
||||
Logos / Symbols | Attention calling / Associative / Transferable | Outdated / Ambiguous
|
||||
Characters | Rich meaning / Attention getting | Outdated / Globalization
|
||||
Slogan / Jingle | Highly memorable / catchy / meaningful | Translation / music taste
|
||||
Packages | Recognision / info / meaning | Production / Channel
|
||||
| Element | Advantages | Disavantages |
|
||||
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Names | Anchor, Quick | Difficult to change, globalization |
|
||||
| Logos / Symbols | Attention calling / Associative / Transferable | Outdated / Ambiguous |
|
||||
| Characters | Rich meaning / Attention getting | Outdated / Globalization |
|
||||
| Slogan / Jingle | Highly memorable / catchy / meaningful | Translation / music taste |
|
||||
| Packages | Recognision / info / meaning | Production / Channel |
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.3 Color and taglines
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -590,57 +593,57 @@ Packages | Recognision / info / meaning | Production / Channel
|
|||
- Strong perceptions
|
||||
- Consistencty is difficult
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
### Color table
|
||||
|
||||
Color | Attributes
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Red | Appetite, love, excitement
|
||||
Blue | Productive, men, curb appetite
|
||||
Green | Tranquillity, health, money, nature, fertility
|
||||
Brown | Reliable, boredom, practical
|
||||
White | Purity, innocence, empty, spacious
|
||||
Black | Evil, death, mourning, slim
|
||||
Yellow | Bright, energy, eye fatigue
|
||||
Orange | Excitement, enthusiasm, warmth, action
|
||||
Lavender | Calm, relaxation
|
||||
Purple | Royalty, waelth, success, wisdom
|
||||
Pink | Girl, calming, warm
|
||||
| Color | Attributes |
|
||||
|----------|------------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Red | Appetite, love, excitement |
|
||||
| Blue | Productive, men, curb appetite |
|
||||
| Green | Tranquillity, health, money, nature, fertility |
|
||||
| Brown | Reliable, boredom, practical |
|
||||
| White | Purity, innocence, empty, spacious |
|
||||
| Black | Evil, death, mourning, slim |
|
||||
| Yellow | Bright, energy, eye fatigue |
|
||||
| Orange | Excitement, enthusiasm, warmth, action |
|
||||
| Lavender | Calm, relaxation |
|
||||
| Purple | Royalty, waelth, success, wisdom |
|
||||
| Pink | Girl, calming, warm |
|
||||
|
||||
### Color emotion guide (by The Logo Company)
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
2. Symbols
|
||||
- Communicate associations
|
||||
- Multiple associations
|
||||
- Positive feelings: liking
|
||||
- Can get outdated
|
||||
- Communicate associations
|
||||
- Multiple associations
|
||||
- Positive feelings: liking
|
||||
- Can get outdated
|
||||
|
||||
3. Slogans
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Remove ambiguity
|
||||
- Create equity and emotion
|
||||
- Reinforce the name and symbol
|
||||
- Positioning strategy
|
||||
- Remove ambiguity
|
||||
- Create equity and emotion
|
||||
- Reinforce the name and symbol
|
||||
|
||||
Basics:
|
||||
|
||||
- Short
|
||||
- Differentiated from competition
|
||||
- Unique
|
||||
- Easy to say and remember
|
||||
- Cannt have any connotation
|
||||
- Protect and trademark
|
||||
- Emotion
|
||||
- Short
|
||||
- Differentiated from competition
|
||||
- Unique
|
||||
- Easy to say and remember
|
||||
- Cannt have any connotation
|
||||
- Protect and trademark
|
||||
- Emotion
|
||||
|
||||
Types:
|
||||
|
||||
- Imperative
|
||||
- Descriptive
|
||||
- Superlative
|
||||
- Provocative
|
||||
- Clever
|
||||
- Imperative
|
||||
- Descriptive
|
||||
- Superlative
|
||||
- Provocative
|
||||
- Clever
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.4 Brand elements: Packaging
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -652,18 +655,18 @@ Aesthetic and function: Grab attention and work well
|
|||
|
||||
Distribution channels:
|
||||
|
||||
- Retailers
|
||||
- Changing channels
|
||||
- Which Retailer like which package
|
||||
- Retailers
|
||||
- Changing channels
|
||||
- Which Retailer like which package
|
||||
|
||||
Colors:
|
||||
|
||||
- See preceding section
|
||||
- See preceding section
|
||||
|
||||
Shape:
|
||||
|
||||
- excuse for a new product
|
||||
- Really strong brand image
|
||||
- excuse for a new product
|
||||
- Really strong brand image
|
||||
|
||||
## 3.5 Brand elements: Persuasion
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -695,8 +698,8 @@ Difficult ! Interpret what they already believe
|
|||
|
||||
A good celebrity endorser is:
|
||||
|
||||
- Expert: Information
|
||||
- Peripheral: Attractive
|
||||
- Expert: Information
|
||||
- Peripheral: Attractive
|
||||
|
||||
1. Considerations:
|
||||
- Audience fit
|
||||
|
@ -725,11 +728,12 @@ Why some companies kept Tiger Woods and others not ?
|
|||
|
||||
### Use of celebrity
|
||||
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Explicit| Endorse product
|
||||
Implicit| Use product
|
||||
Imperative| Should use product
|
||||
Co-present| Appears with product
|
||||
| Type of use | Reason |
|
||||
|-------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| Explicit | Endorse product |
|
||||
| Implicit | Use product |
|
||||
| Imperative | Should use product |
|
||||
| Co-present | Appears with product |
|
||||
|
||||
Exposure to marketing cues:
|
||||
- Motivation to elaborate + ability -> Central route
|
||||
|
@ -741,12 +745,13 @@ Brand equity must be actively managed over time: must be reinforced
|
|||
|
||||
### 5 rationale for brand change
|
||||
|
||||
---|---
|
||||
Initial identity and execution was poorly conceived | Consumer interest, brand association, sales
|
||||
Target for identity and execution is limited | Reach a broader market
|
||||
Identity and execution is out of date | keep up to date
|
||||
Identity and execution loses its edge | old fashioned
|
||||
Identity and execution just became tired | Change generate "news"
|
||||
| Situation | Rationale |
|
||||
|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Initial identity and execution was poorly conceived | Consumer interest, brand association, sales |
|
||||
| Target for identity and execution is limited | Reach a broader market |
|
||||
| Identity and execution is out of date | keep up to date |
|
||||
| Identity and execution loses its edge | old fashioned |
|
||||
| Identity and execution just became tired | Change generate "news" |
|
||||
|
||||
**Consistency**
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -774,7 +779,7 @@ Important that people believe changes
|
|||
|
||||
Major points:
|
||||
|
||||
- Consistency is valuable for strong brands
|
||||
- All elements works in harmony
|
||||
- Change is sometimes necessary but be cautious
|
||||
- Understand sources of equity: Point of parity / Points of differentiation
|
||||
- Consistency is valuable for strong brands
|
||||
- All elements works in harmony
|
||||
- Change is sometimes necessary but be cautious
|
||||
- Understand sources of equity: Point of parity / Points of differentiation
|
||||
|
|
233
Week2.md
233
Week2.md
|
@ -4,15 +4,17 @@ author: "François Pelletier"
|
|||
output: pdf_document
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Wharton School - Introduction to marketing
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 4: Customer centricity
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.1 From product-centric to customer-centric management
|
||||
|
||||
Three axis of marketing
|
||||
|
||||
- Performance superiority: Having the best products
|
||||
- Operational excellence: Low cost and efficiency
|
||||
- Customer intimacy: Who is the customer. How intimate we want to get to add value.
|
||||
- Performance superiority: Having the best products
|
||||
- Operational excellence: Low cost and efficiency
|
||||
- Customer intimacy: Who is the customer. How intimate we want to get to add value.
|
||||
|
||||
What stores are customer inmtimate ?
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -22,11 +24,11 @@ All about making money by maximising the value of the company
|
|||
Total value of the company = time value of money -> Maximising shareholders value
|
||||
Volume and cost reduction:
|
||||
|
||||
- Will it scale : Can we deliver our products and services at scale ?
|
||||
- Different metrics:
|
||||
- Volume
|
||||
- Costs
|
||||
- Market share (how well you will do right in the future)
|
||||
- Will it scale : Can we deliver our products and services at scale ?
|
||||
- Different metrics:
|
||||
- Volume
|
||||
- Costs
|
||||
- Market share (how well you will do right in the future)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Fine tuning the metrics
|
||||
2. Growth
|
||||
|
@ -36,61 +38,62 @@ Volume and cost reduction:
|
|||
- Innovation (extending products)
|
||||
- Companies work in product/service expertise (silos).
|
||||
- Competitive advantage
|
||||
4. Mental process: Divergent thinking, different uses for the same product
|
||||
3. Mental process: Divergent thinking, different uses for the same product
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.2 Cracks in the product centric approach
|
||||
|
||||
Changes in the last 15-20 years:
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging trends are here to stay
|
||||
- Emerging trends are here to stay
|
||||
|
||||
Leading factors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Commoditization (technology enables product development)
|
||||
- Lifecycle is shorter
|
||||
- Always must have a new product coming
|
||||
- No more natural monopoly power
|
||||
- Smart customers
|
||||
- Technology enabled informatino flow
|
||||
- Aware of options availabl for them
|
||||
- Put mode demand of companies
|
||||
- Have to extract value from product
|
||||
- Retail saturation
|
||||
- Tech enabled delivery
|
||||
- Instant availability
|
||||
- Globalisation
|
||||
- Deregularization : Must be more competitive
|
||||
- Commoditization (technology enables product development)
|
||||
- Lifecycle is shorter
|
||||
- Always must have a new product coming
|
||||
- No more natural monopoly power
|
||||
- Smart customers
|
||||
- Technology enabled informatino flow
|
||||
- Aware of options availabl for them
|
||||
- Put mode demand of companies
|
||||
- Have to extract value from product
|
||||
- Retail saturation
|
||||
- Tech enabled delivery
|
||||
- Instant availability
|
||||
- Globalisation
|
||||
- Deregularization : Must be more competitive
|
||||
|
||||
More demanding customers:
|
||||
|
||||
- How will the product solve my problem
|
||||
- end-to-end solutions with products form multiple vendors
|
||||
- Example: IBM
|
||||
- Customer centric solutions provider
|
||||
- Harder to commoditize
|
||||
- Left building and slling products
|
||||
- How will the product solve my problem
|
||||
- end-to-end solutions with products form multiple vendors
|
||||
- Example: IBM
|
||||
- Customer centric solutions provider
|
||||
- Harder to commoditize
|
||||
- Left building and slling products
|
||||
|
||||
Information systems allow customer tracking
|
||||
|
||||
- Before:
|
||||
Know the sales
|
||||
Don't know who buys and how many they buy
|
||||
- Now: Know who buys what and when
|
||||
- Before:
|
||||
Know the sales
|
||||
Don't know who buys and how many they buy
|
||||
- Now: Know who buys what and when
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.3 Data driven business models
|
||||
|
||||
Harrahs:
|
||||
|
||||
- Casino chain in the US
|
||||
- Loyalty programs
|
||||
- Games / meals / rooms at a really granular data
|
||||
- Detect thresholds (when to offer a meal, ...)
|
||||
- Casino chain in the US
|
||||
- Loyalty programs
|
||||
- Games / meals / rooms at a really granular data
|
||||
- Detect thresholds (when to offer a meal, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
Tesco:
|
||||
|
||||
- Grocery chain in UK
|
||||
- Loyalty program
|
||||
- What products are boucht in Tesco vs. products bought elsewhere.
|
||||
- Know which customer can switch to competition easilyDefending against Wal-Mart
|
||||
- Grocery chain in UK
|
||||
- Loyalty program
|
||||
- What products are boucht in Tesco vs. products bought elsewhere.
|
||||
- Know which customer can switch to competition easilyDefending against Wal-Mart
|
||||
|
||||
## 4.4 Three cheers from direct marketing
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -108,10 +111,10 @@ What kind of product for the most valuable customers and how to attract them. Ca
|
|||
|
||||
None of the big firms are really customer centric:
|
||||
|
||||
- Walmart: Best at product-centric
|
||||
- Apple: Best at product superiority, begins to collect data abour customers with iStore
|
||||
- Starbucks: Customer-centric only at local level.
|
||||
- Nordstorm: Great personalized service, but not based on CLV, so does not target the best customers but all of them.
|
||||
- Walmart: Best at product-centric
|
||||
- Apple: Best at product superiority, begins to collect data abour customers with iStore
|
||||
- Starbucks: Customer-centric only at local level.
|
||||
- Nordstorm: Great personalized service, but not based on CLV, so does not target the best customers but all of them.
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 5: The Opportunities and Challenges of Customer Centricity
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -119,14 +122,14 @@ None of the big firms are really customer centric:
|
|||
|
||||
How do you define customer centricity ?
|
||||
|
||||
- Development and delivery of product and services
|
||||
- Fulfill the current and future needs of a select set of customers
|
||||
- Maximise their long-term value to the firm
|
||||
- Development and delivery of product and services
|
||||
- Fulfill the current and future needs of a select set of customers
|
||||
- Maximise their long-term value to the firm
|
||||
|
||||
You have to be willing to change:
|
||||
|
||||
- Risky
|
||||
- Require data and models
|
||||
- Risky
|
||||
- Require data and models
|
||||
|
||||
Do something even if someone is not an actual customer because he/she will be one later
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -161,34 +164,34 @@ Who is your customer ?
|
|||
|
||||
Example: Healthcare:
|
||||
|
||||
- Patient
|
||||
- Doctor
|
||||
- Hospital
|
||||
- Insurance company
|
||||
- Patient
|
||||
- Doctor
|
||||
- Hospital
|
||||
- Insurance company
|
||||
|
||||
Procter & Gamble: Customer = Retailers
|
||||
|
||||
- It could be the customers in a few years: get ready for a direct marketing approach
|
||||
- It could be the customers in a few years: get ready for a direct marketing approach
|
||||
|
||||
Barriers to customer-centricity:
|
||||
|
||||
- Data
|
||||
- Regulatory issues
|
||||
- Control: Impossible to move
|
||||
- Specific challenges for each company
|
||||
- Resources available
|
||||
- Build IT, hire employees
|
||||
- Data
|
||||
- Regulatory issues
|
||||
- Control: Impossible to move
|
||||
- Specific challenges for each company
|
||||
- Resources available
|
||||
- Build IT, hire employees
|
||||
|
||||
What competitors are doing in this area:
|
||||
|
||||
- Financial services
|
||||
- Hotels and hospitality
|
||||
- Be the first ones !
|
||||
- Financial services
|
||||
- Hotels and hospitality
|
||||
- Be the first ones !
|
||||
|
||||
Does it make sense to be customer-centric ?
|
||||
|
||||
- Technology initiatives
|
||||
- Experiments
|
||||
- Technology initiatives
|
||||
- Experiments
|
||||
|
||||
You have to prepare before taking the big step.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -200,27 +203,27 @@ Focus on the right customers for strategic advantage
|
|||
|
||||
Product-centric approach have some cracks:
|
||||
|
||||
- Commoditization
|
||||
- Well-informed customers
|
||||
- Globalization
|
||||
- Commoditization
|
||||
- Well-informed customers
|
||||
- Globalization
|
||||
|
||||
Customer-centric:
|
||||
|
||||
- Promising alternative
|
||||
- Not clearly understood
|
||||
- Many firms are tauted to be customer-centric but are not really
|
||||
- Promising alternative
|
||||
- Not clearly understood
|
||||
- Many firms are tauted to be customer-centric but are not really
|
||||
|
||||
Clear definition:
|
||||
|
||||
- Celebration of customer heterogeneity
|
||||
- Customer lifetime value
|
||||
- Celebration of customer heterogeneity
|
||||
- Customer lifetime value
|
||||
|
||||
How to manage tactics:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Show me the money"
|
||||
- Can't be world-calss on 3 tactics
|
||||
- Doing one well can be really lucrative
|
||||
- A lot trickier than we think of
|
||||
- "Show me the money"
|
||||
- Can't be world-calss on 3 tactics
|
||||
- Doing one well can be really lucrative
|
||||
- A lot trickier than we think of
|
||||
|
||||
Where tu put the extra dollar ?
|
||||
- Most managers would put it either in retention or development
|
||||
|
@ -234,17 +237,17 @@ Why for customers we would like the cheapest to acquire ?
|
|||
|
||||
VPA: Value per acquisition = Customer lifetime value
|
||||
|
||||
- Upper bound for spending to acquire a new customer
|
||||
- A lot of value in customers that we don't appreciate
|
||||
- Match info with what customer prove to be over time
|
||||
- Upper bound for spending to acquire a new customer
|
||||
- A lot of value in customers that we don't appreciate
|
||||
- Match info with what customer prove to be over time
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer acquisition summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Avoid CPA mentality
|
||||
- Ceiling instead of floors
|
||||
- Heterogeneity with CLV (search words, geographical, social)
|
||||
- Be more patient and forward-looking when judging acquisition efforts
|
||||
- Firms tends to underspend on acquisition
|
||||
- Avoid CPA mentality
|
||||
- Ceiling instead of floors
|
||||
- Heterogeneity with CLV (search words, geographical, social)
|
||||
- Be more patient and forward-looking when judging acquisition efforts
|
||||
- Firms tends to underspend on acquisition
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.2 Customer retention
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -262,27 +265,27 @@ Average expected lifetime: Accounts for customer heterogeneity.
|
|||
|
||||
### Customer retention summary
|
||||
|
||||
- There is no average customer
|
||||
- Difference can be huge between average measures and accounting for heterogeneity
|
||||
- Attrition elasticity is much lower than in the homogeneous case
|
||||
- Investment in reducing attrition give more modest returns than expected
|
||||
- There is no average customer
|
||||
- Difference can be huge between average measures and accounting for heterogeneity
|
||||
- Attrition elasticity is much lower than in the homogeneous case
|
||||
- Investment in reducing attrition give more modest returns than expected
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.3 Customer development I
|
||||
|
||||
Make existing customers as valuable as possible
|
||||
Loyalty programs themselves are not a tool for customer development
|
||||
|
||||
- Cross selling
|
||||
- Up-selling
|
||||
- Increase frequency and volume
|
||||
- Premium pricing
|
||||
- Cross selling
|
||||
- Up-selling
|
||||
- Increase frequency and volume
|
||||
- Premium pricing
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.4 Customer development II
|
||||
|
||||
Metric:
|
||||
|
||||
- Share of wallet: How many needs are met by this firm
|
||||
- Amount of product and services
|
||||
- Share of wallet: How many needs are met by this firm
|
||||
- Amount of product and services
|
||||
|
||||
Share of wallet is not correlated with size of wallet
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -291,34 +294,34 @@ Good and bad news about cross-selling
|
|||
Good: Customer's share are correlated
|
||||
Bad: Some customer will not become better customers
|
||||
|
||||
- Upside of developmenet opportunities is more limited than managers think
|
||||
- Icing on the cake: Not to change the customer but unlock value that is already there
|
||||
- Upside of developmenet opportunities is more limited than managers think
|
||||
- Icing on the cake: Not to change the customer but unlock value that is already there
|
||||
|
||||
But: Acquisition is not valuable in saturated markets
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Celebrating heterogeneity
|
||||
- Smart acquisition
|
||||
- Don't overspend retention:
|
||||
flighty customers will fly away no matter what you do or will become unprofitable
|
||||
- Celebrating heterogeneity
|
||||
- Smart acquisition
|
||||
- Don't overspend retention:
|
||||
flighty customers will fly away no matter what you do or will become unprofitable
|
||||
|
||||
## 6.5 Wrap-up
|
||||
|
||||
Making customer centricity profitable:
|
||||
|
||||
- Need to have the technology to track data and do projections
|
||||
- Update regularly the CLV
|
||||
- Break customers into segments that we cam measure:
|
||||
- When they reach us
|
||||
- What products they buy first
|
||||
- What campaign bring them to us
|
||||
- Allocate retention and development ressources appropriately:
|
||||
target marketing communications based on a segment characteristics
|
||||
- Constantly experiment with these tactics
|
||||
- Send different messages to different people
|
||||
- Bottom up perspectives to drive product line decisions
|
||||
- Think about competition identifying the same high-value customers too
|
||||
- Need to have the technology to track data and do projections
|
||||
- Update regularly the CLV
|
||||
- Break customers into segments that we cam measure:
|
||||
- When they reach us
|
||||
- What products they buy first
|
||||
- What campaign bring them to us
|
||||
- Allocate retention and development ressources appropriately:
|
||||
target marketing communications based on a segment characteristics
|
||||
- Constantly experiment with these tactics
|
||||
- Send different messages to different people
|
||||
- Bottom up perspectives to drive product line decisions
|
||||
- Think about competition identifying the same high-value customers too
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
171
Week3.md
171
Week3.md
|
@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ author: "François Pelletier"
|
|||
output: pdf_document
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
#Week 7 : Go to market strategies
|
||||
Wharton School - Introduction to marketing
|
||||
|
||||
# Week 7 : Go to market strategies
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.1 Introduction and execution
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -51,21 +53,20 @@ What is wrong with the status-quo ?
|
|||
Success = Product x Marketing
|
||||
|
||||
You have to be good at both, on a scale of 0 to 10:
|
||||
- Have a great product
|
||||
- Have the right customer, brand fit, STP and 4P's
|
||||
|
||||
- Have a great product
|
||||
- Have the right customer, brand fit, STP and 4P's
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.3 Friction
|
||||
|
||||
2 most important frictions
|
||||
|
||||
- Search frictions:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search frictions:
|
||||
+ Where do I buy a TV ?
|
||||
+ Who will have the best price and assortment
|
||||
+ Search cost to get a better deal
|
||||
|
||||
- Geographical frictions:
|
||||
|
||||
+ Cost vs benefits
|
||||
+ Leave the tyranny of local options
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,43 +75,48 @@ You have to be good at both, on a scale of 0 to 10:
|
|||
Prior to the internet: all markets were local
|
||||
|
||||
Internet: Allow businesses to pool customers
|
||||
- In smaller markets: get unavailable goods
|
||||
- Get information: How to spend our time (complement)
|
||||
|
||||
- In smaller markets: get unavailable goods
|
||||
- Get information: How to spend our time (complement)
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.5 Academic research
|
||||
|
||||
Content:
|
||||
- A lot is purely local (services, restaurants, people to date)
|
||||
- Websites: Yelp, OKCupid
|
||||
|
||||
- A lot is purely local (services, restaurants, people to date)
|
||||
- Websites: Yelp, OKCupid
|
||||
|
||||
1 million population yiends 50-60 websites
|
||||
|
||||
Product: Farther you live from physical retail location: go virtual else go to nearby store.
|
||||
|
||||
Online:
|
||||
- Lower prices or lower search costs
|
||||
- Transact with others more efficiently
|
||||
- Better information about local activities
|
||||
- Improved customer convenience
|
||||
|
||||
- Lower prices or lower search costs
|
||||
- Transact with others more efficiently
|
||||
- Better information about local activities
|
||||
- Improved customer convenience
|
||||
|
||||
## 7.7 The long tail
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Historically: World of hits
|
||||
Now: Infinite slots
|
||||
|
||||
Long tail exists:
|
||||
|
||||
- Economics of storage and distribution (supply side)
|
||||
- Endogenous: moreways to discover variety (demand side)
|
||||
- Economics of storage and distribution (supply side)
|
||||
- Endogenous: moreways to discover variety (demand side)
|
||||
|
||||
Old-new economics:
|
||||
- Pareto: 80%/20% rule
|
||||
- Zipf: 2nd: 1/2 of the first, 3rd = 1/3 of the first
|
||||
|
||||
- Pareto: 80%/20% rule
|
||||
- Zipf: 2nd: 1/2 of the first, 3rd = 1/3 of the first
|
||||
|
||||
Key principles: tyranny of locality
|
||||
- Once upon a time in India
|
||||
|
||||
- Once upon a time in India
|
||||
|
||||
Not enough demand for a movie theater but profitable from renting.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -134,7 +140,7 @@ Differences between 2 channels:
|
|||
- Gini coefficient: G = A/(A+B)
|
||||
- Lorenz curve
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Internet: More evenly distributed sales. differences not attributed to price and availability. More niche products sold.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -175,12 +181,12 @@ What matters the most in internet retailing:
|
|||
|
||||
2 important patterns:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Sales start in larger cities and spread through proximity
|
||||
2. Sales in smaller areas with "similar" kinds of people (age, education, occupation, ...)
|
||||
1. Sales start in larger cities and spread through proximity
|
||||
2. Sales in smaller areas with "similar" kinds of people (age, education, occupation, ...)
|
||||
|
||||
Long tail over location
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## 7.10 Preference isolation
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -206,7 +212,7 @@ A third of the value is attributed to brands.
|
|||
|
||||
[Stocks for the long run](http://www.amazon.com/Stocks-Long-Run-Definitive-Investment/dp/0071800514)
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Goals and tactics:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -239,27 +245,28 @@ Organic celebrity: [Ree Drummond](http://thepioneerwoman.com/), one of the large
|
|||
|
||||
Customer goals:
|
||||
|
||||
- Attract
|
||||
- Engage
|
||||
- Retain
|
||||
- Attract
|
||||
- Engage
|
||||
- Retain
|
||||
|
||||
Subject to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Never pay more to acquire than you will recoup (CLV > AV)
|
||||
2. CLV need to incorporate RLV (referral lifetime value)
|
||||
- 8% of customers are marketing agents
|
||||
- Top 100 will generate 15000 other customers
|
||||
1. Never pay more to acquire than you will recoup (CLV > AV)
|
||||
2. CLV need to incorporate RLV (referral lifetime value)
|
||||
- 8% of customers are marketing agents
|
||||
- Top 100 will generate 15000 other customers
|
||||
|
||||
Attractive target customer:
|
||||
|
||||
- Monologue to conversation with technology
|
||||
- Amplification through virtual and real world synergy
|
||||
- Long tail leverage
|
||||
- Marketing "spend" as an asset
|
||||
- Monologue to conversation with technology
|
||||
- Amplification through virtual and real world synergy
|
||||
- Long tail leverage
|
||||
- Marketing "spend" as an asset
|
||||
|
||||
Food for thoughht:
|
||||
- Status-quo experience that is broken
|
||||
- [Warby Parker](http://warbyparker.com/)
|
||||
Food for thought:
|
||||
|
||||
- Status-quo experience that is broken
|
||||
- [Warby Parker](http://warbyparker.com/)
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.3 Reputation and reviews
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -272,24 +279,24 @@ One friction of market: we don't want to try new stuff
|
|||
|
||||
Lots of sites for vacation, restaurants, cars, movies, contractors:
|
||||
|
||||
- Chris Dixon from Trip Advisor:
|
||||
Startup build from bringing information into market.
|
||||
- More info: Almost always better
|
||||
- Information by firms: might affect behavior as well (better or worse)
|
||||
- Chris Dixon from Trip Advisor:
|
||||
Startup build from bringing information into market.
|
||||
- More info: Almost always better
|
||||
- Information by firms: might affect behavior as well (better or worse)
|
||||
|
||||
Data:
|
||||
|
||||
- Hygiene grades cards shown in window of restaurants (mandatory in LA/NYC)
|
||||
- Impact of demand:
|
||||
- A: increase of 5,7%
|
||||
- B: Increase of 0.7%
|
||||
- C: Decrease of 1%
|
||||
- Objective quality went up: Hospital admission for gfood-borne illnesses down 13%
|
||||
|
||||
- Hygiene grades cards shown in window of restaurants (mandatory in LA/NYC)
|
||||
- Impact of demand:
|
||||
- A: increase of 5,7%
|
||||
- B: Increase of 0.7%
|
||||
- C: Decrease of 1%
|
||||
- Objective quality went up: Hospital admission for gfood-borne illnesses down 13%
|
||||
|
||||
Principles:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review systems change behavior
|
||||
- Should be objective and verifiable, not actually the case
|
||||
- Review systems change behavior
|
||||
- Should be objective and verifiable, not actually the case
|
||||
|
||||
** Amazon and BN **
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -304,10 +311,10 @@ Might motivate to review their own books. Review writing service/ fake reviews.
|
|||
|
||||
According to Bing Lui, a data mining expert:
|
||||
|
||||
- 1/3 reviews are fake
|
||||
- A lot of money is involved in this market
|
||||
- 1/3 reviews are fake
|
||||
- A lot of money is involved in this market
|
||||
|
||||
[This Man Made $28,000 A Month Writing Fake Book Reviews Online](read.bi/OiuMh0)
|
||||
[This Man Made $28,000 A Month Writing Fake Book Reviews Online](https://read.bi/OiuMh0)
|
||||
|
||||
Difficult for a data mining algorithm because of sarcasm, jokes, ...
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -317,13 +324,13 @@ Summary: Reviews could be helpful but authenticity is a concern.
|
|||
|
||||
Approach and key findings:
|
||||
|
||||
- Examine distributions of reviews
|
||||
- Net gains should be highest for independent hotels with single-unit owners.
|
||||
- Such hotels have more 5* and neighbors have more 1*
|
||||
- Examine distributions of reviews
|
||||
- Net gains should be highest for independent hotels with single-unit owners.
|
||||
- Such hotels have more 5* and neighbors have more 1*
|
||||
|
||||
## 8.4 Product life cycle
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
1. Innovators (Research and Development)
|
||||
2. Early adopters (Introduction)
|
||||
|
@ -339,23 +346,23 @@ Obesity: Controversial / Spreads like a virus (video)
|
|||
|
||||
Network:
|
||||
|
||||
- Pathways through which information, advice, resources, support flows between people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Physical or virtual
|
||||
- Homophily:
|
||||
+ Characteristics of participants that are similar (cultural, taste, income)
|
||||
- Can be simple (dyad) or complex (hundred, thousand of nodes)
|
||||
- Nodes and connections
|
||||
- Ability to share information and resources
|
||||
- Constraints / geography
|
||||
- Pathways through which information, advice, resources, support flows between people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Physical or virtual
|
||||
- Homophily:
|
||||
+ Characteristics of participants that are similar (cultural, taste, income)
|
||||
- Can be simple (dyad) or complex (hundred, thousand of nodes)
|
||||
- Nodes and connections
|
||||
- Ability to share information and resources
|
||||
- Constraints / geography
|
||||
|
||||
Participation in a network is a choice. You decide how many contacts you have, how you will be central and how transitive (embedded) you will be.
|
||||
|
||||
You are being affected ny a network:
|
||||
|
||||
- Strangers and loose connectinos can affect us
|
||||
- 1 person is 4% of influence
|
||||
- 15 people are 40% of influence
|
||||
- Strangers and loose connectinos can affect us
|
||||
- 1 person is 4% of influence
|
||||
- 15 people are 40% of influence
|
||||
|
||||
Six degrees of separation between you and anyone in the world
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -365,7 +372,7 @@ Unit of analysis: Zip code, city blocks
|
|||
|
||||
First order contiguity
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
* [Social contagion and trial on the internet: Evidence from online grocery retailing](http://d1c25a6gwz7q5e.cloudfront.net/papers/1283.pdf)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -520,14 +527,14 @@ Price is more than a number: It sends signals to customer (premium/discount)
|
|||
- It lowers the price sensitivity
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Var measured | Natural | Experimental |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Actual purchase | Sales data | Field experiment
|
||||
|Reference / Intention | Surveys | Tradeoff analysis
|
||||
| Var measured | Natural | Experimental |
|
||||
|-----------------------|------------|-------------------|
|
||||
| Actual purchase | Sales data | Field experiment |
|
||||
| Reference / Intention | Surveys | Tradeoff analysis |
|
||||
|
||||
Field experiment:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
In a grocery in the 1990's
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -607,9 +614,7 @@ Overview:
|
|||
|
||||
- Channel structure: Who are the players
|
||||
|
||||
Direct vs. Indirect
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
### Direct vs. Indirect
|
||||
|
||||
Indirect reduce the amount of transactions
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -619,9 +624,9 @@ Strategic advantage of direct:
|
|||
- quality of direct marketing feedback
|
||||
- Bundling with high margin products and services
|
||||
|
||||
Channel flow / functions
|
||||
### Channel flow / functions
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
How it can be disrupted by technology
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -644,7 +649,7 @@ Information flows:
|
|||
- Matching needs and solutions
|
||||
- Matching customers ans suppliers
|
||||
- Assessing and certifying quality
|
||||
- Negociation / closing the deal
|
||||
- Negotiation / closing the deal
|
||||
- Ordering
|
||||
- Market feedback
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
5
compile.sh
Normal file
5
compile.sh
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
|||
pdflatex matrices.tex
|
||||
pandoc --standalone -i Week1.md -o Week1.pdf
|
||||
pandoc --standalone -i Week2.md -o Week2.pdf
|
||||
pandoc --standalone -i Week3.md -o Week3.pdf
|
||||
pdftk Week1.pdf Week2.pdf Week3.pdf cat output Intro-To-Marketing-Coursera.pdf
|
BIN
matrices.pdf
Normal file
BIN
matrices.pdf
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue